<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Religion on Mark Ayers</title><link>https://philoserf.com/tags/religion/</link><description>Recent content in Religion on Mark Ayers</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Mark Ayers</copyright><lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://philoserf.com/tags/religion/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Consciousness as Activity, Not Substance</title><link>https://philoserf.com/posts/consciousness-as-activity-not-substance/</link><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://philoserf.com/posts/consciousness-as-activity-not-substance/</guid><description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There is no consciousness; there is only being conscious of something.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Consciousness is not a thing but an activity—directed awareness. It never appears alone. It is always consciousness &lt;em&gt;of&lt;/em&gt; something: an object, a sensation, a situation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Phenomenology supports this. Since Husserl, consciousness has been understood as intentional: always directed toward something. Try to isolate &amp;ldquo;pure consciousness&amp;rdquo; and you find only minimal content—breath, darkness, silence, the sense of effort. Consciousness has no existence apart from what it&amp;rsquo;s directed at. Treating it as a thing is a category error. Language confirms this: we are conscious of pain, of a sound, of an idea, but never of &amp;ldquo;consciousness itself&amp;rdquo; except in retrospect.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>